Skip to main content

Welcome to Book Club

Welcome to the 10WLA Book Club!


Hello Class and welcome to the 10WLA book club.

If you have any issues flick me an email at ac100523@avcol.school.nz

Enjoy!

Comments

  1. Wow this book looks absolutely amazing!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello, The Logic Demon. How is it hanging?

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Somebody interested in biology should compare the following:
    Why Evolution is True, by Jerry A. Coyne
    The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution, by Richard Dawkins
    Evolution for Everyone, by David Sloan Wilson

    The Lie: Evolution, by Ken Ham
    Evolution: a Theory in Crisis, by Michael Denton
    Evolution: Still a Theory in Crisis, by Michael Denton

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am baffled by Ken Ham's stupidity. As you and I have mentioned previously, couldn't you believe in design via evolution? The fact that there still exists a large group of evolution deniers in America is very worrying.

      Delete
    2. While I agree "evolution deniers in America" generally are uninformed, I believe we should be careful in defining evolution in order to avoid confusion. Francisco J. Ayala provides several possible definitions of evolution:

      (1) the thesis "that organisms are related by common descent"
      (2) "evolutionary history—the details of when lineages split from one another and of the changes that occurred in each lineage"
      (3) "the mechanisms or processes by which evolutionary change occurs"

      According to Ayala, definitions (2) and (3) are controversial issues and certainly not established facts, contrary to popular opinion, while Ayala accords definition (1) with the status of fact. When describing evolution as fact, we are implicitly invoking definition (1).

      Furthermore, it is technically incorrect to speak of "the theory of evolution," as there are a variety of different interpretations of the evolutionary paradigm: Darwinian natural selection, Lamarckian evolution, neo-Darwinian evolution, process structuralism and so forth. Therefore, strictly speaking, we should refer to "the theories of evolution" instead.

      Delete
    3. Okay, I must apologise for being misleading in my grouping of Denton's two books alongside the embarrassing Ken Ham's pastiche of usual pseudoscience The Lie: Evolution. Unlike Ham's hillbilly fundamentalist creationist blithe dismissal of evolutionary theory, Denton is an eminently qualified biochemist who challenges the orthodox neo-Darwinian interpretation of evolutionary theory. I very much agree with his overarching thesis, as I hold to a non-Darwinian process structuralist interpretation of evolution similar to Denton. So, his work is a lot more akin to something like Simon Conway Morris's Life's Solutions: Inevitable Humans in a Lonely Universe rather than Ken Ham's young-Earth-creationist propaganda.

      However, the response of the scientific community to Denton's original book Evolution: a Theory in Crisis has still been pretty negative, with the famous Niles Eldredge describing it as "fraught with distortions." Denton is sort of like Michael J. Behe, who, while definitely having prestige qualifications, is rejected by the overwhelming consensus of scientists. Of course, both Denton and Behe are totally unlike Ken Ham, who regularly spoon-feeds patent nonsense to his peanut gallery of gullible fans. Poor fellow.

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  6. yee am i part of book club now?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

A LITERARY CRITIQUE OF THE WHALE RIDER, BY WITI IHIMAERA

Short Stories: WHERE IS DANIEL?

The Book of Heroic Failures